Archive for the ‘Things That Suck’ Category

All through this election cycle, we have heard Republican Candidates, Fox News, and other conservative media rail against “Political Correctness”.  The fact of the matter is they really don’t hate political correctness, as long as they get to define what that is.

The anti-pro choice, anti-gay, anti-woman agendas they are trying to get America to buy into are all versions of “political correctness” as defined by conservatives.  If you do not believe in their versions of these issues, you are “politically incorrect” according to their talking points.

However, nothing exemplifies this more than the conservative “outrage” over the Super Bowl Halftime show with Beyoncé.

It began immediately after the new day’s news cycle started yesterday.  Steve Doocy thought Coldplay was just OK and Bruno Mars was “fantastic,” he telegraphed his point by noting that Beyoncé “was in there too.”

“I couldn’t really make out what Beyoncé was saying,” host Brian Kilmeade added after the show aired some footage of her performance. “But at the end, we find out Beyoncé dressed up in a tribute to the Black Panthers, went to a Malcolm X formation. And the song, the lyrics, which I couldn’t make out a syllable, were basically telling cops to stop shooting blacks!”

“I think it was outrageous,” Giuliani said. “The halftime show I thought was ridiculous anyway. I don’t know what the heck it was. A bunch of people bouncing around and all strange things. It was terrible.”

“This is football, not Hollywood,” he continued, “and I thought it was really outrageous that she used it as a platform to attack police officers who are the people who protect her and protect us, and keep us alive. And what we should be doing in the African-American community, and all communities, is build up respect for police officers.”

So, I guess you can say the main theme in all of this is that a black woman was showing disrespect towards police officers.  If you are a black person and don’t like the police, there is something very “politically incorrect” about that stance.  If you believe that “Black Lives Matter” there is something “politically incorrect” about you.

Yet, on the other side of the country, there are still four domestic terrorists holding a wildlife refuge sanctuary hostage, with guns.  Those four holdouts put out their own video over the weekend.  Fox News doesn’t seem to have any problem with their attacks against “police officers”, maybe because they are targeting the nation’s “police officers” the FBI.

These domestic terrorists are all white.  They are claiming they are only “exercising” their right to free speech.  Yet, they need guns to exercise their free speech.

Many of the original group are under arrest.  These four want to be allowed to leave without any charges brought against them for their terrorist activities.  They have even built barricades and “defensive” positions in preparation for a shootout with the FBI.

“We just got done talking with the FBI,” said 27-year-old Blanchester, Ohio resident. “They consider fortifying a crime.”  Fry said he, Jeff Banta of Nevada, and husband and wife Sean and Sandy Anderson of Idaho have “every right” to defend themselves from the “oncoming onslaught of people with fully automatic rifles (and) armored vehicles.

In another video posted Sunday, Sean and Sandy Anderson are sitting together and the husband says they feel like hostages because they can’t leave without being arrested.

“What are they to do with us?” Sean Anderson says. “They either let us go, drop all charges because we’re good people, or they come in and kill us. How’s that going to set with America?”

Even some politicians are getting in on the act.  A Nevada state Assembly member who is sympathetic to Bundy’s cause, Michelle Fiore, said Monday she and lawmakers from several other states plan to meet in Portland this week to protest the jailing of Bundy and his followers. She said the lawmakers are members of a group called the Coalition of Western States, which opposes federal management of Western lands.

“My folks are prisoners for exercising political free speech. That is not OK,” the Republican lawmaker told the AP.

So, you can see the differences between these two “incidents” and why it is outrageous that Republicans keep talking about “political correctness.”  If you are a white person with a gun, and you commit a domestic terrorist act like seizing a wildlife refuge center, and if you are barricading yourself in order to “survive” a planned shootout with police you are “exercising political free speech.”

On the other hand, if you are a black musician, and you do a video or Halftime Show at the Super Bowl showing support for a non-violent group called Black Lives Matter, you are poisoning the minds of the people.

The term “political correctness” has many meanings.  One is designed to prevent hurt feelings.  One is designed to show compassion.  And, from what we have seen from Fox News and other conservative media, one means you can threaten and/or kill federal officers as long as you are a conservative white person.

And the “shirts” keep marching along!


Read Full Post »

As I sat and watched another Republican Debate debacle Saturday night, I often wandered off into thinking just who is supporting each of the candidates.  With the campaign finance laws the way they are, especially since Citizen’s United, we really don’t know who the money people are behind each candidate.

This election has outpaced passed elections for lies, dirty tricks, and misleading information since Richard Nixon in 1968 and 1972.  But, who is really behind all of these lies and dirty tricks?

So, I wondered what it would be like if they had to advertise just who their “sponsors” were.  Wouldn’t it be nice to know just who is backing the robot called Marco Rubio?  His constant repeating of talking points is ridiculous.

Or, what about who is backing Chris Christie?  The one who actually brought up the robot issue on stage.  It might help us make up our mind as to which candidate we really want to support.

There is a group of Californians called “California Is Not For Sale” who want to change the law there so candidates, and for that matter, all elected officials will have to show their sponsors.  They would be forced to wear the company logos on their suits.

You know, just like athletes from race car drivers to golf players and others wear their logos on their clothes.  Wouldn’t it be nice to see just who these politicians are being paid by?

This is a ballot initiative that says that politicians, elected ones included, must wear logos on their clothes anytime they appear for a speech, vote, or to testify.  The logos must be large enough so people in the audience can read them. They would be required to wear their ten biggest contributors.

You may think this is stupid.  But is it really?  Imagine watching CSPAN and seeing s congressman standing on the floor making a speech against a “green energy” bill.  This congressman is talking about how he is morally and ethically opposed to the bill, all the while wearing an Exxon/Mobile logo on his lapel.

That might make you wonder if he is really “morally or ethically” against the bill, or if he is doing his sponsor’s bidding.  What about people like Ted Cruz who constantly talks about “gun rights” having to wear a logo from gun manufacturers on his lapel.  Maybe he isn’t so much for “gun rights” as much as for the makers of guns making more money.

John Cox, the chairman for California Is Not For Sale says “yeah, this is funny, but this is the system.”  The U.S. Supreme Court in its decision on Citizens United said that “corporations are people too, and have a right to spend money on elections as they see fit.”

That is the current law.  But, there is nothing in the decision that would make it illegal to make our elected politicians or candidates advertise from whom they are getting their money.

If nothing else, it would let the general public make better decisions on who to back based on more information about the candidates.  I seriously doubt that this law would force any politician to change their behavior.  But, it would give us more information as to why they are behaving as they are.

The best way to fight corruption is to force elected office holders to “advertise” their sponsors.  We probably wouldn’t even have to repeal Citizens United.  The fact these logos would be on display for all to see might just be enough to stop the corruption that Citizens United unleashed on our political process.

I think this is a great idea.  We just need to make it part of our complete election process.  This would take away the veil of secrecy as to who may be buying our politicians.  That would be a nice start to regaining our democracy.

Read Full Post »

During every election, we keep hearing the same term tossed around like it is a “hot potato”.  Republicans are especially in love with the term.  Democrats love it as well, but don’t think everyone gets a chance to live it.

That term is “The American Dream”.  In order to fully understand what is meant by that term, we need to explore just what it means to you.  If you don’t have that understanding you cannot actually live it.

James Truslow Adams, in his book The Epic of America, which was written in 1931, stated that the American dream is “that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for everyone, with opportunity for each according to ability or achievement.”

In reality, it is not a dream about owning big houses or fancy cars.  But, rather a dream of social order in which each man and each woman shall be able to attain to the fullest stature of which they are innately capable, and be recognized by others for what they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position.

In other words, it shouldn’t matter if you are white, black, Native American, Asian, or anything else, you should be able to reach that goal of a better and richer life.

Unfortunately, over the years, this “dream” has fallen on hard times.  We no longer look at the “American Dream” in this context.  We rather look at it as having fancy houses or cars.  We work our lives away in order to make more money so we can “enjoy” those benefits.

Yet because our focus has reached such a materialized outlook, we work so many hours that we cannot truly “enjoy” those benefits.  As a result, we have become slaves to our own materialism.

Furthermore, more and more people in the “working poor” class believe that the “American Dream” is unattainable to them.  They are forced to work two jobs just to support their families at the “survival” level.  There is no “dream” in that circumstance.

More and more people retire in this country without sufficient savings and have to rely on Social Security just to survive.  It isn’t necessarily their fault.  Wages have plummeted for the Middle-Class and expendable income has dropped.  As a result, they have no additional money to “save”.  Fewer and fewer corporations offer “retirement pensions” to workers.

During the twentieth century we saw the rise of unions.  Those unions created the 40 hour work-week.  They created higher wages for employees.  They ensured that employees shared in the profits of the corporations they worked for.  Later in the century, we saw the “Right to Work” laws begin passing in several states.  The average American today works 49 hours per week.  The 40 hour week has become an myth to most Americans.

Unions were placed in the cross-hairs of corporations and Republican candidates, and their power weaned.  Today, far fewer people belong to unions.  Yet in states where unions are still strong, pay is higher than in the states where unions have lost power.

Rather than being recognized for ability and achievement, laborers are measured against the “bottom” line.  As a result, pay has stagnated or lowered in favor of higher profits.  The labor that employees put forth is unrecognized and unrewarded.

In the over 200 years of our country’s existence, we came to realize that government is needed to fund public schooling.  We realized that our children needed education to be competitive in the real world.  States and the Federal governments put millions of dollars into public schools. Today, we are seeing those school budgets slashed and the quality of education declining.  We have gone from first in the world in education to sixteenth.

Today, candidates talk about the “ladder to success” as part of the “American Dream”.  Yet they have placed the lowest rung of that ladder so high the majority of Americans cannot reach it.  So, how can they climb the ladder?

Today, perhaps more than since the civil rights era, your place of birth, your race, your religion, your family’s economic status have more to do with reaching that lower rung on the ladder than anything else.  The lower your economic status, the less likely you will be at achieving that mythical “American Dream”.

Instead, you are to blame for all of the ills that our country faces.  You are the reason that the rich aren’t getting rich fast enough.  You are the reason that our country is in “trouble” as Republican candidates like to say.

The “American Dream” really isn’t the “American Dream”.  It is every individual’s dream.  Making sure our families are properly supported and given the things they need.  Receiving a good education.  Having a chance to move up the economic ladder.  Being treated with dignity and respect regardless of our economic status.

Those are primary elements of every person’s dream.  They are the things that get us up in the morning to work for a living.  They are the things that keep us going.  Trying to make our children’s future brighter than our’s was.

Unfortunately, the rich and powerful have hijacked the “American Dream”.  They have declared that only they and their off-spring have a right to live that dream.  They have made it a materialistic dream of riches, fancy houses, cars, boats, and private planes.

They, along with their political abettors have turned the “American Dream” into the “American Nightmare” for most Americans.  We are supposed to slave at their companies for low wages.  We are supposed to “work more” as Jeb Bush once said in order to grow their riches.

George Carlin once said “it is called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it”.  To me, what Republicans are calling the “American Dream” is a myth.  It is simple rhetoric used to make you believe you are worth something.  All the while they are blaming you for your lowly plight and making sure you do not rise up the ladder with their policies.

When you hear candidates of either party talk about the “American Dream” you will hopefully realize they are not talking about your version of the “American Dream”.

Thomas Wolfe said, “…to every man, regardless of his birth, his shining, golden opportunity ….the right to live, to work, to be himself, and to become whatever thing his manhood and his vision can combine to make him.”

That is probably the best definition of the mythical “American Dream” I have seen.  If that is your definition too, then the Republican Party is not your Party.  They would prefer you be the fodder for the mills.  You don’t count, and your dreams are just that, dreams that will never reach reality.

Read Full Post »

To those of us who remember Watergate, there is something disturbing coming out of the Republican caucus in Iowa.  It surrounds that wonderful Canadian Senator Ted Cruz.

Cruz has been running around the country espousing the wonderfulness of Ronald Reagan.  As a matter of fact, he wants us to believe that he is the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan.

Unfortunately, in Iowa, he appeared more like Richard Nixon than Ronald Reagan.  There were two incidents that he pulled off that hurt his opponents at the polls.

One can be claimed to be nothing more than a political stunt, the other can only be defined as lying.  The first incident involved a mailing.  His campaign sent out thousand of “Voter Violations” notices to people in Iowa giving the impression that the state was keeping tabs on who caucused and who didn’t.

The intent was to shame people into caucusing for Cruz.  It said they could clear up their “voter violation” by caucusing and recommended they caucus for Cruz.

It appears to have worked.  Cruz wanted at least 170,000 Republicans to caucus.  He figured he needed that many in order to get enough to win.  The turnout was 180,000 so kudos to Republicans for participating.

Cruz’ team said it was nothing “unusual” for such mailers to be sent out.  His opponents claim it was fraud.  The State does not track if you caucus or not and never sends out notices like this one.  Even the Secretary of State in Iowa called it fraudulent.

The second incident took place during the actual caucus.  This amounts to clear lying to people in order to get votes.  It seems that Ben Carson told CNN that after the caucus, he was planning to return to Florida “to get a fresh change of clothes” and that he planned to attend the National Prayer Breakfast.  CNN reported that news on-air.

The Cruz campaign immediately jumped on the announcement.  But, they didn’t actually say what the announcement said.  They had their floor managers go to Ben Carson supporters and state that Carson was “leaving the campaign” so they should vote for Cruz instead of Carson.

This was all happening during the actual caucus.  When Carson called out the Cruz campaign the next morning, Rick Tyler, the Cruz campaign communications director, said on Morning Joe:

On the Ben Carson issue, it’s just false.  We simply as a campaign repeated what Ben Carson said in his own words.  That is not a dirty trick.

Only they didn’t simply repeat what Carson said.  They lied and said Carson was “leaving the race” and that is not the same.  Cruz did issue an apology of a kind.  He said:

This was a mistake from our end, and for that I apologize to Dr. Carson.

But, of course, he had more to say:

Last night when our political team saw the CNN post that Dr. Carson was not carrying on to New Hampshire and South Carolina, our campaign updated our grassroots leaders just as we would for any breaking news story.

That’s fair game. What the team then should have done was send around the follow-up statement from the Carson campaign clarifying that he was indeed staying in the race when that came out.

The thing is they changed the content of what Carson actually said in order to get more votes.  Yesterday, Carson was on O’Reilly and said:

Here’s the issue, a culture exists within the Cruz camp that would allow people to take advantage of a situation like this in a very dishonest way.

Let’s see what in fact the Cruz campaign will do about those individuals who inappropriately disseminated this information knowing that the caucuses were not over.  They were absolutely anxious to get it out there, weren’t they?

Carson is correct.  Here is someone trying to run for President on the basis that he is an outsider.  Yet, he has resorted to the same type of dirty tricks we came to see from Richard Nixon.  Even the denials from Cruz and his staff sound all too familiar.

Carson said on Fox News that he will fight what he sees as dishonesty in politics.

There are so many people who have said, that’s just the way it is, that’s the way politics is, and you just accept it.

If we expose these kinds of things and we condemn them and if people are the ones who have to say this is unacceptable, we will not do this, this is not the right thing to do, it is not the Christian thing to do, don’t accept it.

But, Cruz claims to be the evangelical’s political messiah!  How can he be involved in un-Christian political practices?  Because he isn’t a Christian at all.  He is simply Richard Nixon reincarnated.

And, the “shirts” keep marching along!

Read Full Post »

The way the media swarms around the Iowa Caucuses, you would think it will determine who wins the nomination for their party.  New Hampshire can just close down their primary next week.  The winners have been announced, so don’t waste any money on a primary that doesn’t mean anything.

I don’t actually try to predict results, but on the Republican side I was not surprised to see Cruz win in Iowa.  Nor, was I all that shocked that Rubio came in third, even closely behind Trump.

Iowa after all is an evangelical state and they don’t really care about your politics, they care about your religion.  Remember, Rick Santorum won in Iowa just four short years ago.  He didn’t fare well after that.  Or, remember Michelle Bachmann won the “straw poll” just four years ago.  Those two facts should stifle any Cruz winning the nomination assertions going around.

It is on the Democratic side that I see the most drama.  Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are in a virtual tie.  It appears that Clinton may edge out Sanders in Iowa but Sanders leads Clinton big in New Hampshire.  That is real cause for concern for Clinton.

There is the fact that Obama beat Clinton in Iowa in 2008, a surprise win for the President.  Another loss in Iowa could spell doom for Clinton in he quest to be the nominee.

I am frankly still torn between the two.  Sanders talks a very good game, but he isn’t too keen on real specifics for many of his plans.  He says, for example, that he will ensure veterans will receive the help they need and deserve.  But, I haven’t heard just how that will happen.

On the other hand, Clinton still has a lot of baggage following her around.  I don’t think she did anything illegal while Secretary of State using her private email accounts, but that is still to be determined fully.

So, I will wait and see if I can get more details about the two before I endorse either of them.  There are still too many questions for me to make up my mind.

The one thing I noticed on the Republican side is that a full 75% of Republicans caucused for liars.  I know that is a harsh criticism, but it is true.  None of the top three delegate getters are known to tell the truth.

It is also very interesting that a person who now claims to be a “Christian” but was divorced three times came in second in a very religious state.  To me, that is something that is being missed by the so-called pundits about Iowa.  I was not surprised that Trump came in second, but I must admit I was somewhat surprised that he came as close as he did.

It is true that Rubio will be glowing after last night.  He will claim that he “won” even though he came in third.  His placement wasn’t that much of a surprise, but the numbers he garnered were.  Yet, he was the one “establishment” Republican that the party seems to be willing to back.

As a result, he got a big boost from the establishment wing leading up to the caucus.  It will be interesting just how much that wing of the party will be willing to go to stop both Cruz and Trump by throwing their unconditional support behind Rubio.

To me, the polices that are coming out from the three top runners on the Republican side are the most dangerous in my lifetime.  And that includes Richard Nixon.  I dread to believe that they are the “best” the party has to offer.

In any case, the nomination process has officially opened.  Iowa was no surprise to me, except maybe on the Democratic side.  New Hampshire may be interesting on the Republican side, but I believe Sanders will win on the Democratic side.  But, you never know.

It would be nice, as we proceed down the road, if the media would actually put the candidates feet to the fire and ask some meaningful questions.  Like what are your specific plans and policies if you should win the election.  The problem is that the media has lost focus on what their job is.  They lost focus that their primary duty is to “inform” the population.  They are more interested in “dirt” and “scandals” than the actual news.

There is going to be a lot of talk about winners and losers last night.  But, it is Iowa.  A state with a very small niche population.  All last night has shown me is that the Republicans will nominate some kind of wacko to be their standard-bearer.

The Democrats seem to have a real race on their hands.  Something they had not expected when this all started.  From what I have seen so far, their two choices are far better for America than the whole field of Republicans put together.  At least they have illustrated a capacity to think.

There are a lot of issues that still need to be talked about.  Climate Change is real.  Public Education is in trouble.  Hate is running rampant in too many areas of the country.  The Affordable Care Act is constantly under attack.  Energy needs to be addressed.  We need to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels for a cleaner environment and a better, less expensive energy source for our businesses to compete globally.

These are all things that the top three Republicans want to avoid talking about.  They seem to believe that it is not our responsibility to address them or even try to fix them.

They don’t care if you have lead in your drinking water.  They don’t care if you care about the environment.  They want to protect their biggest investors, fossil fuel companies, and shut down clean energy projects.  They don’t care if you have health insurance or if your children can read and write.  They are perfectly fine with your hating people, but only if they are Muslim, minority, women, or gay.

That is what I took from the Republican side last night.  These are the very things that 75% of Iowa voters voted for!

The determining factor in this whole process, including the general election, will be if Americans actually participate.  If they do, the people may actually be the winners.  If not, we will all lose.  It is up to you, so please vote!

Read Full Post »

In 1991, the New York State Legislature received a letter that read in part:

While disabled veterans should be given every opportunity to earn a living, is it fair to do so to the detriment of the city as a whole or its tax paying citizens and businesses?

Do we allow Fifth Avenue, one of the world’s finest and most luxurious shopping districts, to be turned into an outdoor flea market, clogging and seriously downgrading the area?

In 2004, Mayor Bloomberg received a letter that read in part:

Whether they are veterans or not, they [the vendors] should not be allowed to sell on this most important and prestigious shopping street.

The image of New York City will suffer… I hope you can stop this very deplorable situation before it is too late.

These letters were prompted because after the Civil War, New York City accorded special “veterans licenses” to disabled veterans.  That practice continues.  These special licenses allow veterans to “peddle” merchandise from carts on city streets in order to make a living.

The author of those letters is planning to hold a “fund-raising” event for veteran groups tonight instead of participating in the Republican Presidential Debate.  That is right, it was Donald Trump.

Apparently, talking about veterans is different than helping veterans.  These vets are trying to make a living by selling products.  Trump doesn’t like them hanging around his gleaming headquarters on 5th Avenue because they aren’t as pretty as his workers.

Trump likes to talk like he really cares about veterans.  His actions seem to indicate that he doesn’t give a damn about them.  I find it weird that people trying to make a living on the same street as Donald Trump are considered as “vagrants” rather than vendors.

There is very little information as to which veterans organizations will participate in tonight’s so-called fundraising.  The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America said they would not accept any money from tonight.  Their leader said “we need policies, not charity.”

As of last night, the Wounded Warriors Project was unaware of any participation either.  So, just who is going to “benefit” from this event?

Sorry, but Trump’s history of treating veterans with dignity isn’t exactly what he wants you to think.  He has wanted to get rid of veteran peddlers from 5th Avenue because they are an eye-sore.  He never served. His children never served.

Yet, when his fight with Fox News hits a new high, he uses veterans as his next prop.  He claims he will raise money for them instead of debating.  I hope he raises a ton of money for veterans tonight.  If, that is, the event actually takes place.

However, I would rather hear what policies he plans to help veterans if he is elected.  I am tired of “lip service” from candidates who try to show “patriotism” by praising veterans and then doing nothing to help us.

Since the year 2000, the only things the Republican Party has given America is two wars that were never paid for, a collapsed economy, austerity measures that hurt millions upon millions of Americans, and more wounded veterans from those wars without helping them.

This latest side-show is nothing different.  There are even rumors that candidates like Cruz and Fiorina would like to help out by sending representatives to the event.   Cruz’ voting record proves he doesn’t give a shit about veterans.

Sorry, Republican Policies towards veterans has been anything but helpful.  They really look upon us as Donald Trump sees the veteran vendors on 5th Avenue, with disgust.

Which is why I say this latest gambit is nothing more than using veterans as a prop.  Shame on them!


Read Full Post »

The Republican Party claims to be a “law and order” party.  They want law and order for the good of the country.  There is a backlash among conservatives to the Justice Reform Legislation now making its way through Congress.  They claim that the legislation will “release violent felons” onto America’s streets.

But, let one of their operatives get slammed and accused of crimes, and law and order doesn’t seem to be the same.  Enter the Planned Parenthood videos and their creator.

The State of Texas has been holding investigations into Planed Parenthood over the “sting” videos that CMP President David Daledien has put out.  The Republicans jumped on these videos as “proof” that Planned Parenthood was selling body parts.

One problem has emerged.  A Grand Jury in Harris County, Texas which is where Houston is located, said they found no evidence of wrongdoing by Planed Parenthood, but indicted Daledien and his partner in the sting for criminal activities.

Daledien and a partner were charged for tampering with a government issued identification card to falsely gain entry into a conference in order to covertly videotape discussions of fetal tissue donation with Planned Parenthood officials — a felony charge that carries a punishment of not less than two, and not more than 20 years in prison, and a fine of up to $10,000.

So, according to this Grand Jury investigation into the Planned Parenthood videos, the only people who broke the law were the people who made the videos.  This was a two month-long investigation.  And, the end result was that Planed Parenthood was cleared of all criminal charges.

But, that doesn’t stop the Republicans from claiming that it isn’t true.  They have basically gone off the rails on this decision.  The Governor of Texas, Gregg Abbott, said the results of this investigation has no bearing on the State’s Investigation.  Even though several other states have held their own investigation and found nothing wrong with Planned Parenthood’s activities.

The candidates and Fox News has blown a gasket as well.  Fiorina stuck to the script. “Here’s what I know: Planned Parenthood has been trafficking in body parts. Planned Parenthood has been altering late-term abortion techniques to this specific purpose of harvesting body parts,” she told CNN.

Marco Rubio expressed concern by saying: “We’ll need to learn more, but I’m disturbed that while Planned Parenthood, who are the ones that were actually selling off these (body) parts were found having done nothing wrong, the people who tried to expose them are the ones that are now facing criminal charges.”

Fox News on the other hand went into defensive mode.  “So does this sound like a political hit job?” Megyn Kelly asked Fox’s Judge Andrew Napolitano on her show Monday night. “Absolutely. This is a political hit job.”

This morning on Fox and Friends, Napolitano continued his anger against the indictments.  He claims that “this type of indictment will chill, will deter journalists who want to have conversations with people.”   To make sure he isn’t left out, Co-host Steve Doocy then claimed that “journalists use the techniques every day,” citing “60 Minutes” and “20/20.”

That part of their argument, the one about 60 Minutes and 20/20 may be true to some extent, but they don’t use false identification to gain access.  Nor, do they heavily edit the tape in order to show something that does not exist.

According to the Republican Party, if you get caught with 10 grams of marijuana in your possession, you should go to jail.  If you are a conservative trying to, according to how Megyn Kelly would put it, commit a “political hit job” on the enemy, you are a hero and not a criminal, even if you break the law.

The simple fact is that a Grand Jury in the State of Texas has found that there is nothing to the videos purported to be proof of Planned Parenthood “selling fetal body parts”.  On the other hand, they did find that the people who put together these false videos did break the law.

What we have is a Grand Jury in a very Conservative State who says there is no criminal activity by Planned Parenthood.  Yet, the Governor of the state and the Republican candidates for President says they are wrong.  With Fox News calling it a “political hit job”.  Seems you just can’t trust conservatives, even if you are a conservative!

A reasonable person would think that this is the end to the Planed Parenthood witch hunt.  But, no one ever called conservatives reasonable people.  The witch hunt will continue.  The lies will continue from the candidates.  And women will continue to suffer as the political fight over abortion continues.

If this form of “law and order” sounds familiar, remember, the “shirts” keep marching along.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 424 other followers