Sometimes, you gotta smile:
[T]he House took a moment Thursday to honor pi, the Greek letter symbolizing that great constant in mathematics representing the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter.
An irrational number that has been calculated to more than 1 trillion digits, pi is a concept not totally foreign to today’s Washington. But in this case, the goal was to promote efforts by the National Science Foundation to improve math education in the United States, especially in the critical fourth to eighth grades.
Rounded off, pi equates to 3.14, hence the designation of March 14 as Pi Day under the resolution. Informal celebrations have been held around the country for at least 20 years, but Thursday’s 391-10 vote is the first time Congress has joined the party.
“I’m kind of geeked up about it,” Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.) told POLITICO. “It’s crazy, but I’m a whole lot more excited about that than congratulating the winner of last year’s Rose Bowl.
“I’m not making this up. I have been fascinated by pi since I was a kid. It blows my mind. It’s lovely. The fact that it’s sort of this infinite number. I just think it’s this magical thing. … There’s a real beauty to mathematics.”
Engineering and technology companies backed the effort, and like most things in the House, there’s a San Francisco angle. Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has pressed hard for Congress to do more to promote science, and the San Francisco Exploratorium, in her home city, takes credit for the first Pi Day celebration in 1988, with staff and public marching around one of its circular spaces and then consuming fruit pies.
“I am asking our nation’s students and teachers, for all of our sake, to go out and have fun around Pi Day,” said Rep. Lincoln Davis (D-Tenn.) who managed the bill on the floor this week for the House Science Committee.
Right on. (And the Exploratorium totally rocks. A hands-on science museum that illustrates concepts with amazing gadgets that you can touch and manipulate. Created by Frank Oppenheimer, by the way – brother of Robert.) This actually makes me feel better about Congress.
It figures that the Nays were all Republicans, but God knows what their reasons were. I’ve given up trying to understand them. It can’t be objections to symbolic resolutions – many of the opponents have sponsored such things themselves. Apparently, they just don’t like pi. As members of the creationism party, that’s hardly surprising, but still dismaying. There are at least 10 members of the Republican Party in Congress who took a principled stand against a number. Sheesh . . .
And on that front, though it may seem silly to honor a number, even one as vital as pi, it’s a step forward for some of our legislators. One recalls the time in 1897 when the Indiana state legislature nearly approved a bill acquiring patent rights to a new method of “squaring the circle” – a geometric impossibility – which implied, as a side effect, that pi was a rational number equal to 3.2 or various other figures.
And as far as that goes, why didn’t they honor Square Root Day?
Oh, let’s not politicize the maths
neither politcal party is particular good with numbers, and you know that.
/has wave function equation tattooed on her back.
There are at least 10 members of the Republican Party in Congress who took a principled stand against a number. Sheesh . . .
It’s a principled stand against irrationality. When does “e” come up for a vote, so they can boo that, too?
More puzzling – what is the partisan divide on “i”?
It figures that the Nays were all Republicans, but God knows what their reasons were.
“Utah Congressman Jason Chaffetz, AKA jasoninthehouse.
His latest tweet, as of 5:05 PM ET on Thursday, reads: “I cannot support Pi Day as just one day. It should go on forever. I voted “Nay.” It passed 391-10.”"
From http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2009/03/who-would-vote-against-pi-day.html
That’s the same guy who got his ass kicked in a leg wrestling contest with Stephen Colbert.
“I cannot support Pi Day as just one day. It should go on forever. . . .”
OK – now that’s funny. I’ll give him credit for that.
An irrational number that has been calculated to more than 1 trillion digits
What is the national debt, Alex.