<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Party Loyalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/</link>
	<description>The View From the Sinister Side of Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2012 20:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexapro.</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25244</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lexapro.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Lexapro....&lt;/strong&gt;

Lexapro. Lexapro medicine....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lexapro&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Lexapro. Lexapro medicine&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melaf</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[melaf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HURTS  OF    CONDOMS

WHICH USED AS


CONTRACEPTIVE


 TO PREVENT PRAGNANCY IN


WOMEN



_______________________


When the man using



CONDOMS



As contraceptive the woman

Become mad and crazy... this duo to the semen of

Man is remaining


In the    CONDOMS


And it was not ejaculated and dropping in


Vagina of women there is not sweet taste for


    Sex meeting


Like that you are drinking tea or coffee with out

Sugar the coffee or tea is not sweet it is bitter

Semen


Of man is like Sugar it make the coitus and


Sex meeting    sweet    to woman



The sex meeting



    Sweet





  With out




 CONDOMS




When man is not Using



 CONDOMS



 In sex meeting with woman the


Semen of man will Ejaculated and dropping and



Falling in vagina of Woman then the semen is




Absorbed by vagina wall and inter the blood



Circulation and reached the brain


Then the women mind become in a convenience


Mood and good feeling she is not be a



Madden Or Crazy   woman



______________________


ADVICE FOR YOU


_______________________

To good enjoy and pleasure in your sexual live


And good ERECTION of your CLITORIS i give



You   this      ADVICE.......




STOP

Practice reading   and    writing...


Because practice reading and writing


Loosening and lowering



The   SEXUAL    ability and power of you.


 GO TO LIVE IN


Villages and forestry far from cities and towns


Practice READING and WRITING make you unusual


Woman or SADOMITE (SODOMY) women....

__________________________________

SO WE HAVE NEW METHOD FOR



   CONTRACEPTION


-----------------------------------------



BARLEY AS CONTRACEPTIVE AND


SEX TONIC FOR MEN AND WOMEN
___________________________



BREAKFAST

* Barley loaf   - bread

* Margarine

* Jam

* Tea or coffee
________________________



LUNCH


* Barley loaf - bread

* Grill ham

*   Salad
(Cucumber, celery, Pepper, lettuce)

* Pickly - mayonnaise

* Pepsi cola

______________________________




DINNER

* Barley loaf - bread

* Fried egg in vegetable oil
(With out shaking the yolk)

* Prawns

* Oyster

* Shrimp

* Salad
 (Cucumber, celery, pepper, lettuce)

-----------------------------------------

IT IS    FORBIDDEN TO EAT THE

Following FOOD cause it increase

Fertility in WOMEN and MEN

* RICE

* HONEY

* FRUITS...........


(DATE - GRAPE - FIG - APPLE -


APRICOT - BANANA - PEACH .......etc)

* OVINE MEAT (SHEEP)

* BOVINE MEAT (COW)

* FISH
---------------------------------------


The statistical indication of

Successfulness of this method is finding

Out in population of



 CHINA



Cause they depend on RICE since old


Or ancient times......
_____________]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HURTS  OF    CONDOMS</p>
<p>WHICH USED AS</p>
<p>CONTRACEPTIVE</p>
<p> TO PREVENT PRAGNANCY IN</p>
<p>WOMEN</p>
<p>_______________________</p>
<p>When the man using</p>
<p>CONDOMS</p>
<p>As contraceptive the woman</p>
<p>Become mad and crazy&#8230; this duo to the semen of</p>
<p>Man is remaining</p>
<p>In the    CONDOMS</p>
<p>And it was not ejaculated and dropping in</p>
<p>Vagina of women there is not sweet taste for</p>
<p>    Sex meeting</p>
<p>Like that you are drinking tea or coffee with out</p>
<p>Sugar the coffee or tea is not sweet it is bitter</p>
<p>Semen</p>
<p>Of man is like Sugar it make the coitus and</p>
<p>Sex meeting    sweet    to woman</p>
<p>The sex meeting</p>
<p>    Sweet</p>
<p>  With out</p>
<p> CONDOMS</p>
<p>When man is not Using</p>
<p> CONDOMS</p>
<p> In sex meeting with woman the</p>
<p>Semen of man will Ejaculated and dropping and</p>
<p>Falling in vagina of Woman then the semen is</p>
<p>Absorbed by vagina wall and inter the blood</p>
<p>Circulation and reached the brain</p>
<p>Then the women mind become in a convenience</p>
<p>Mood and good feeling she is not be a</p>
<p>Madden Or Crazy   woman</p>
<p>______________________</p>
<p>ADVICE FOR YOU</p>
<p>_______________________</p>
<p>To good enjoy and pleasure in your sexual live</p>
<p>And good ERECTION of your CLITORIS i give</p>
<p>You   this      ADVICE&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>STOP</p>
<p>Practice reading   and    writing&#8230;</p>
<p>Because practice reading and writing</p>
<p>Loosening and lowering</p>
<p>The   SEXUAL    ability and power of you.</p>
<p> GO TO LIVE IN</p>
<p>Villages and forestry far from cities and towns</p>
<p>Practice READING and WRITING make you unusual</p>
<p>Woman or SADOMITE (SODOMY) women&#8230;.</p>
<p>__________________________________</p>
<p>SO WE HAVE NEW METHOD FOR</p>
<p>   CONTRACEPTION</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>BARLEY AS CONTRACEPTIVE AND</p>
<p>SEX TONIC FOR MEN AND WOMEN<br />
___________________________</p>
<p>BREAKFAST</p>
<p>* Barley loaf   &#8211; bread</p>
<p>* Margarine</p>
<p>* Jam</p>
<p>* Tea or coffee<br />
________________________</p>
<p>LUNCH</p>
<p>* Barley loaf &#8211; bread</p>
<p>* Grill ham</p>
<p>*   Salad<br />
(Cucumber, celery, Pepper, lettuce)</p>
<p>* Pickly &#8211; mayonnaise</p>
<p>* Pepsi cola</p>
<p>______________________________</p>
<p>DINNER</p>
<p>* Barley loaf &#8211; bread</p>
<p>* Fried egg in vegetable oil<br />
(With out shaking the yolk)</p>
<p>* Prawns</p>
<p>* Oyster</p>
<p>* Shrimp</p>
<p>* Salad<br />
 (Cucumber, celery, pepper, lettuce)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>IT IS    FORBIDDEN TO EAT THE</p>
<p>Following FOOD cause it increase</p>
<p>Fertility in WOMEN and MEN</p>
<p>* RICE</p>
<p>* HONEY</p>
<p>* FRUITS&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>(DATE &#8211; GRAPE &#8211; FIG &#8211; APPLE -</p>
<p>APRICOT &#8211; BANANA &#8211; PEACH &#8230;&#8230;.etc)</p>
<p>* OVINE MEAT (SHEEP)</p>
<p>* BOVINE MEAT (COW)</p>
<p>* FISH<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>The statistical indication of</p>
<p>Successfulness of this method is finding</p>
<p>Out in population of</p>
<p> CHINA</p>
<p>Cause they depend on RICE since old</p>
<p>Or ancient times&#8230;&#8230;<br />
_____________</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Dragon</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stormy Dragon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stats part of it is trivial.  It&#039;s the data collection part that would be rather onerous, and I don&#039;t really have the time for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stats part of it is trivial.  It&#8217;s the data collection part that would be rather onerous, and I don&#8217;t really have the time for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25241</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgirsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Dan M:&lt;/b&gt;

OK, then make it a bit more complicated and count the &quot;no&quot; votes on &lt;i&gt;new&lt;/i&gt; proposals, and the &quot;yes&quot; votes on renewals.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Dan M:</b></p>
<p>OK, then make it a bit more complicated and count the &#8220;no&#8221; votes on <i>new</i> proposals, and the &#8220;yes&#8221; votes on renewals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan M.</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25240</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 14:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25240</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TG, I&#039;m not sure disagreement is characterized by &#039;no&#039; &lt;i&gt;votes&lt;/i&gt;.  A lot of things could devolve to maintaining status quo, which would often use &#039;yes&#039; votes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TG, I&#8217;m not sure disagreement is characterized by &#8216;no&#8217; <i>votes</i>.  A lot of things could devolve to maintaining status quo, which would often use &#8216;yes&#8217; votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25239</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgirsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;b&gt;Stormy:&lt;/b&gt;

That seems like the kind of thing that could be tested.  Is party loyalty stronger on &quot;no&quot; votes than it is on &quot;yes&quot; votes?  That should be easy enough for some stats geek to go figure out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Stormy:</b></p>
<p>That seems like the kind of thing that could be tested.  Is party loyalty stronger on &#8220;no&#8221; votes than it is on &#8220;yes&#8221; votes?  That should be easy enough for some stats geek to go figure out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Dragon</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stormy Dragon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 20:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My view is more that it&#039;s much easier to get agreement on a negative policy (what not to do) than a positive policy (what to do).  Since the minority party tends to spend more time resisting the majority party&#039;s efforts rather than persuing efforts of its own, it&#039;s likely easier for the minority party to get its members to agree.

If Senator John supports policy A and Senator Joe supports policy B, it&#039;s hard to craft a bill both will vote for, but easy to get them to both vote against a bill for policy C.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My view is more that it&#8217;s much easier to get agreement on a negative policy (what not to do) than a positive policy (what to do).  Since the minority party tends to spend more time resisting the majority party&#8217;s efforts rather than persuing efforts of its own, it&#8217;s likely easier for the minority party to get its members to agree.</p>
<p>If Senator John supports policy A and Senator Joe supports policy B, it&#8217;s hard to craft a bill both will vote for, but easy to get them to both vote against a bill for policy C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tgirsch</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tgirsch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Updated:  I think I get your point now; you weren&#039;t trying to say that the Republicans are okay here, you were trying to say that the Democrats aren&#039;t perfect either.  Which they&#039;re not, but which still doesn&#039;t make them near as bad as the Republicans on this issue.  In any case, my original response is below, unedited, with my original misunderstanding of the point you were trying to make. Thus, the first two paragraphs are utter crap.  The last sentence, however, still has some merit.]

&lt;i&gt;That the amazing &lt;b&gt;*nine*&lt;/b&gt; female Senators — in a party with well more than half of all its voters being female, which prides itself on integration even at the cost of effectiveness — is highly representative of the 51% of the populace that is female.&lt;/i&gt;

Setting aside the fact that I&#039;m not entirely sure that&#039;s a sentence, I&#039;m also not sure that what I think you&#039;re getting at is actually true.  For starters, in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2004 &lt;/a&gt; the female vote went for pro-choice Kerry over pro-life Bush by a 51-48 margin.  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/US/H/00/epolls.0.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2006&lt;/a&gt;, the margin was more dramatic, with Democrats enjoying a 55-43 margin over Republicans among female voters.  In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/index.epolls.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;2000&lt;/a&gt;, women voters preferred Gore over Bush by a similar 54-43 margin.  Since in two of those three cases, the Democrats lost, that female advantage to the Democrats must have been more than offset by the male voters favoring the Republican.  So on what basis do you claim that &quot;well more than half&quot; of Republican voters being female?

Also, the fact that better than two thirds of Americans oppose overturning &lt;i&gt;Roe v. Wade&lt;/i&gt; seems to belie your claim that the GOP&#039;s voting record on the abortion issue is somehow representative of the electorate at large.

But in the end, I suspect that abortion (in particular &quot;partial-birth&quot; abortion) is one of those issues like the Estate Tax, where the more people learn about it, the less likely they are to support banning it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Updated:  I think I get your point now; you weren't trying to say that the Republicans are okay here, you were trying to say that the Democrats aren't perfect either.  Which they're not, but which still doesn't make them near as bad as the Republicans on this issue.  In any case, my original response is below, unedited, with my original misunderstanding of the point you were trying to make. Thus, the first two paragraphs are utter crap.  The last sentence, however, still has some merit.]</p>
<p><i>That the amazing <b>*nine*</b> female Senators — in a party with well more than half of all its voters being female, which prides itself on integration even at the cost of effectiveness — is highly representative of the 51% of the populace that is female.</i></p>
<p>Setting aside the fact that I&#8217;m not entirely sure that&#8217;s a sentence, I&#8217;m also not sure that what I think you&#8217;re getting at is actually true.  For starters, in <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/pages/results/states/US/P/00/epolls.0.html" rel="nofollow">2004 </a> the female vote went for pro-choice Kerry over pro-life Bush by a 51-48 margin.  In <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/states/US/H/00/epolls.0.html" rel="nofollow">2006</a>, the margin was more dramatic, with Democrats enjoying a 55-43 margin over Republicans among female voters.  In <a href="http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2000/results/index.epolls.html" rel="nofollow">2000</a>, women voters preferred Gore over Bush by a similar 54-43 margin.  Since in two of those three cases, the Democrats lost, that female advantage to the Democrats must have been more than offset by the male voters favoring the Republican.  So on what basis do you claim that &#8220;well more than half&#8221; of Republican voters being female?</p>
<p>Also, the fact that better than two thirds of Americans oppose overturning <i>Roe v. Wade</i> seems to belie your claim that the GOP&#8217;s voting record on the abortion issue is somehow representative of the electorate at large.</p>
<p>But in the end, I suspect that abortion (in particular &#8220;partial-birth&#8221; abortion) is one of those issues like the Estate Tax, where the more people learn about it, the less likely they are to support banning it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KTK</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KTK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Stormy:&lt;/strong&gt;

It partly depends on intra-party dynamics in &lt;em&gt;both&lt;/em&gt; groups.

Assuming both parties &lt;em&gt;can&lt;/em&gt; enforce cohesion, the minority party has less use for it, since they&#039;re going to lose every vote anyway. In that case, they can allow their members more leeway to vote their consciences or cover themselves as a sop to back-home constituencies, since it won&#039;t affect the outcome.

If the majority party can&#039;t enforce cohesion, however, then the minority party has a great need for it, since they become the de facto majority as long as they can count on the votes of all their members plus enough of the opposition to tip the balance; to the extent that the minority also lacks cohesion, they are squandering the gift the majority defectors are giving them. Realizing and acting on this has worked very well for the Republicans, courtesy of the Democrats.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stormy:</strong></p>
<p>It partly depends on intra-party dynamics in <em>both</em> groups.</p>
<p>Assuming both parties <em>can</em> enforce cohesion, the minority party has less use for it, since they&#8217;re going to lose every vote anyway. In that case, they can allow their members more leeway to vote their consciences or cover themselves as a sop to back-home constituencies, since it won&#8217;t affect the outcome.</p>
<p>If the majority party can&#8217;t enforce cohesion, however, then the minority party has a great need for it, since they become the de facto majority as long as they can count on the votes of all their members plus enough of the opposition to tip the balance; to the extent that the minority also lacks cohesion, they are squandering the gift the majority defectors are giving them. Realizing and acting on this has worked very well for the Republicans, courtesy of the Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://leanleft.com/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Colin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/07/30/6219/#comment-25235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fact that some women might agree with anti-abortion policy is a moot point.

The fact that prolife policy treats women like they are incapable of making good decisions when given the right to choose is just plain out sexual discrimination, which is apparent in what&#039;s being shown in the policy making pictures here.

It&#039;s not a joke, it&#039;s about rights and who decides who has them.

Personally, I think da menz just wanna be spreadin&#039; their seed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that some women might agree with anti-abortion policy is a moot point.</p>
<p>The fact that prolife policy treats women like they are incapable of making good decisions when given the right to choose is just plain out sexual discrimination, which is apparent in what&#8217;s being shown in the policy making pictures here.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a joke, it&#8217;s about rights and who decides who has them.</p>
<p>Personally, I think da menz just wanna be spreadin&#8217; their seed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

