• Home
  • About

Lean Left

The View From the Sinister Side of Life

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Limbaugh — Mad for RNC Apologizing for Racism
Upgrading WordPress »

Politics Above Everything

July 14, 2005 by Kevin

This is what happens when you put politics above everything else:

Officials tell ABC News the London bombers have been connected to an al Qaeda plot planned two years ago in the Pakistani city of Lahore.

The laptop computer of Naeem Noor Khan, a captured al Qaeda leader, contained plans for a coordinated series of attacks on the London subway system, as well as on financial buildings in both New York and Washington.

“There’s absolutely no doubt he was part of an al Qaeda operation aimed at not only the United States but Great Britain,” explained Alexis Debat, a former official in the French Defense Ministry who is now a senior terrorism consultant for ABC News.

At the time, authorities thought they had foiled the London subway plot by arresting more than a dozen young Britons of Pakistani descent last August in Luton, a city known for its ties to terrorism.

“For some time, the locus of terrorism in Britain has been around the Luton area and in some of the northern cities,” said Michael Clark, professor of defense at King’s College in London.

Security officials tell ABC News they have discovered links between the eldest of the London bombers, Mohammed Sadique Khan, 30, and the original group in Luton. Officials also believe it was not a coincidence the subway bombers all met at the Luton train station last week.

“It is very likely this group was activated last year after the other group was arrested,” Debat said.

What has that to do with politics? Bush’s re-election campaign is apparently the reason the cell had to be rolled up before the Birts were entirely ready:

Here is what we now know. The Pakistani government arrested a 25-year-old computer expert in Lahore on July 13. The arrest was never given to the Pakistani press by the Pakistani government, and no notice appeared in any Pakistani or other newspaper. This absence can only be deliberate, since the Pakistanis could easily have held a press conference to trumpet their new captive. This decision to keep the arrest quiet appears to have been made because Khan had been “flipped,” i.e., had become a double agent and continued to have email contact with al-Qaeda members in London, e.g., but now with the Pakistani military intelligence listening in.

There was no reason for any reporter anywhere to inquire about Khan, since nothing had come out in Pakistan about his case. Pakistani intelligence was passing on to British intelligence what it was finding out about the London cell. Khan was still communicating with it on Monday August 2.

In addition, Khan’s computer had on it surveillance information about financial institutions in New York and Washington that dated back three years, before the September 11 attacks. The Pakistanis shared this information with both British and American intelligence.

In the week of July 26, the week of the Democratic National Convention, the Bush administration made a decision to announce a heightened security alert for those buildings in Washington, DC and New York City. Tom Ridge made the announcement on Sunday, Aug. 1, and there was then a background briefing for reporters.

The Ridge announcement raised the question of where the information on the surveillance of the buildings had come from. Late Sunday afternoon, August 1, the entire national press corps worked the phones furiously, checking with government officials about where Ridge had gotten his tip. The Boston Globe managed to get through to a CIA analyst, who knew the story of Khan’s arrest but refused to give out the specific name.
…

The British, especially MI5 and Home Secretary David Blunkett, had not wanted his name made public, and were furious at all of the detailed information being given out to the public by the Bush administration or in consequence of its revelations. For some reason, the British seem to have feared that the naming of Abu Eisa al-Hindi would complicate the case against him. The Times of India reports that Abu Musa (or Abu Eisa) al-Hindi’s real name is Dhiron Barot. He is one of the 8 charged in London on Tuesday. He is from a Hindu family, but converted to Islam at age 20 and got pulled into jihadi activities in Kashmir (about which he published a book). He was the one who cased the financial institutions in the US for al-Qaeda. The story of Barot, like that of Richard Reid, shows that al-Qaeda isn’t mainly about Islam per se, it is a political-religious ideology that can attract non-Muslims.

The Bush Administration leaked information about an ongoing investigation, blew the cover of a double-agent, and caused the British to have to attempt to destroy the cell before they where prepared. As a result, some in the cell got away, and it appears that some of the London bombers where either connected to the original cell or members of that cell. And why did they do this?

In the week of July 26, the week of the Democratic National Convention, the Bush administration made a decision to announce a heightened security alert for those buildings in Washington, DC and New York City. Tom Ridge made the announcement on Sunday, Aug. 1, and there was then a background briefing for reporters.

The Bush people apparently wanted to take the spot light away from the Democratic Convention, and so they announced information that they should have announced. And that may very well have lead directly to the bombers in London getting out of a British snare.

The war on terrorists is apparently less important than the war on Bush’s political opponents. There just aren’t words to describe how awful this is. Instead of protecting our citizens and our allies, the Bush Administration was apparently more concerned with stealing some of John Kerry’s thunder. And because they apparently put politics above everything else, it looks like they inadvertently let the London bombers slip out of the grasp of the British authorities.

Somehow, if they did let the bombers get away in the course of using terrorism investigations as a cheap political stunt, I doubt that the victims of London will take any solace in the fact that Bush won a second term.

Links via Atrios, and John Avaraios has much more documentation of where the leak came form and the damage it did to the investigation.

Advertisement

Rate this:

Like this:

Like
Be the first to like this post.

Posted in Iraq, Politics, Terrorism | Leave a Comment

No Responses Yet

  1. on July 15, 2005 at 3:05 pm Troy

    I like the way you connect the dots in your blog. I agree with you that it is not beyond the Bush Administration
    to put politics above everything else, I don’t think that’s the case in this particular instance. I can’t seem to
    remember where I read this but Tom Ridge went to the press/public with his warning without the approval of the
    White House. (He got scarred that something might happen under his watch.) He was heavily criticized by other
    Administration officials for revealing information as the investigation was still going on. (I think it was
    Rumsfeld that gave him the tongue lashing.) Tom Ridge let his inexperience in these matters get in the way of
    the ongoing investigation. If anything, the Bush Administration should be accused of putting politics above
    everything else when he chose Tom Ridge to run the Office of Homeland Security. Ridge had no security
    experience up to that point.


  2. on July 15, 2005 at 5:54 pm Mark in Mexico

    Pakistanis knew bombers were their own
    In this disurbing report, everyday Pakistanis waited for almost a week for the news they were sure would come. The bombers were Pakistani or trained in Pakistani madrassas or terror training camps.


  3. on July 15, 2005 at 8:35 pm JollyRoger

    Looks like Phony Tony will never get out from under his “poodle” status.


  4. on July 29, 2005 at 3:42 pm Steve Plonk

    Any person found to be donating money to terrorist organizations should be locked up
    behind bars. Twenty years would be too good
    for them.



Comments are closed.

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 21 other followers

  • Search

  • Authors

    • leanleft
    • Kevin
    • tgirsch
    • Kevin T. Keith
    • Judd
  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Blogroll

    • Atrios
    • Balloon Juice
    • Booman Tribune
    • Daily Kos
    • Digby
    • Ezra Klein
    • Lotus
    • Say Uncle
    • Secret Lives of Scientists
    • Slacktivist
    • Southern Beale
    • Ta-Nehisi Coates
    • Talking Points Memo
    • Washington Monthly
    • Yglesisas
  • Recent Comments

    tgirsch on How Would Uncle Like His …
    tgirsch on How Would Uncle Like His …
    Seerak on How Would Uncle Like His …
    tgirsch on How Would Uncle Like His …
    mike w. on How Would Uncle Like His …
    SayUncle » Con… on How Would Uncle Like His …
    digglahhh on How Would Uncle Like His …
    digglahhh on Hell, No
    Dan M. on Hell, No
    digglahhh on Hell, No
  • Blog Stats

    • 88,756 hits

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by Sadish.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com